PRINCE3 remains PRINCE2®

The complete refresh of the PRINCE2® project methodology and credentials is over and the 2009 version has been released.

PRINCE2 is a project management framework which has wide acceptance in many government areas. The intellectual property of PRINCE2 belongs to the British Crown which has placed the methodology is in the public domain.

Projects in Controlled Environments explains the name and the operative word is ‘controlled’. The business remains in control of its projects and everything in the method can trace back to this fundamental principle. This means the methodology works well in environments where the same organisations is the client and the primary ‘performing organisation’ for the delivery of the project.

The 2009 refresh has:

  • Added 7 principles that were previously implied.
  • Changed 8 Components into 7 Themes (Configuration Management has become part of the Change Theme).
  • Reduced 8 Processes to 7. The former Planning process is dealt with as part of the Plans Theme. 
PRINCE2
For more on PRINCE2 see:  http://www.ogc.gov.uk
  • Added a new chapter on tailoring PRINCE2 to the environment in an attempt to reduce criticisms of the amount of bureaucracy involved in the methodology.
  • A Benefits Review Plan is now created as part of Initiating a Project and updated at end of each stage. Benefits Reviews may occur at the end of stages as well as after closure and the concept of dis-benefits has been introduced. Interestingly, the Senior User is held to account for the realisation of benefits (ie, the customer).
  • The Risk Management chapter has been rewritten to align with other OGC Standards. Response types cover opportunities as well as threats and a Risk Management Strategy introduced.
  • A smaller book focused on the needs of project sponsors ‘Directing Successful Projects with PRINCE2’ has been released.

The structure of PRINCE2:

The 7 principles which are considered universal and self-validating must exist in every project run according to PRINCE2. They are:

  1. Continued business justification
  2. Learn from Experience
  3. Defined Roles and Responsibilities
  4. Manage by Stages
  5. Management by Exception
  6. Focus on products
  7. Tailor to suit the project environment.

The 7 processes are outlined in the diagram above. Underlying these processes are the themes presented in the methodology and these amount to best practice in a project environment. They answer questions about what, why, who, when, how, how much and provide clarity. The Themes are:

  1. Business Case
  2. Organization
  3. Quality
  4. Plans
  5. Risk
  6. Change
  7. Progress

PRINCE2 -v- PMBOK

The primary difference between PRINCE2 and the PMI/ PMBOK® Guide view of projects is the boundaries. PMI (and most likely the new ISO21500) see a project starting when it is initiated by the client and completing once the outputs defined in the project charter are delivered. This is quite likely correct from a project practitioner’s perspective.

PRINCE2 sees the project starting much earlier and continuing through to the realisation of value by the organisation. This is quite likely correct from the perspective of an organisation initiating and managing internal projects.

There is very little difference in terms of the processes used to run a project between PRINCE2 and the PMBOK. What is different is PRINCE2 is totally focused on managing internal projects with organisational managers having a direct say in the management of the overall process and it provides an effective methodology for this circumstance. The PMBOK® Guide is a pure PM standard and has a more generic set of processes that can be adapted to a much wider range of circumstances and used in any situation (eg, a traditional project where the client contracts the project delivery organisation).

Which is best?  What do you think??

We will continue to focus on the PMI range of credentials with our training mainly because of their wider application. PRINCE2 works well in the right circumstances. Whereas, the PMI range of standards seem to apply to most circumstances. But I suppose that is the key difference between a methodology and a generic standard.

Advertisements

10 responses to “PRINCE3 remains PRINCE2®

  1. Pingback: schlossBlog » #202 PRINCE2 vs. PMBOK

  2. I was going to write a piece on the differences between PRINCE2 and the PMBOK.
    In my opinion, while PRINCE2 is practical, with a practical manual, PMBOK is more theoretical.
    In fact, at seminars given by the PMI scores of speakers try to “invent” projects, or the way they are managed.
    A simile: a student after graduation is like a PMP, a graduated guy with work experience is PRINCE2 Practitioner.

    PMBOK is much older than PRINCE2, which was born to improve the success rate of projects, many of which, I suppose, were managed according to PMBOK. PMBOK may have been improved, but it has got old by now.

    • The author of the comment above clearly does not understand the difference between a standard and a methodology. Methodologies describe who, what, how and when things should be done with prescribed forms, committee structures and procedures – everything you find in PRINCE2 and MSP (Lynda is MSP certified).

      Standards specify what and why (the PMBOK almost uniquely among standards also includes some ‘how’). Organisations deploying a ‘standard’ develop appropriate methodologies themselves to achieve the objectives defined in the standard. This was the subject of an earlier blog, see: PMBOK -v- Methodology.

      From a certification process I disagree completely. A PRINCE2 partitioner is fully trained in the use of the PRINCE2 methodology and can undoubtedly write about it. A PMP has extensive and detailed knowledge of general project management theory and the PMBOK ® Guide in particular (plus 36 moths experience directing and leading project activities). Neither certification addresses competency (ie, the capability of a person to effectively apply the knowledge in their workplace to achieve results). As with a BSc or DPM knowledge based certifications are important but only demonstrate knowledge, the personal attributes needed to become competent are additional and not measured by the examinations. We teach the PMI range of certifications and know we are imparting the knowledge needed to pass a certification (CAPM / PMP / PgMP / etc). We are not training people to become competent project managers in their workplaces. There are good competency frameworks around, IPMA, PMI and AIPM all have their own versions that are largely complimentary but this is the subject of a future blog.

      I will ignore the cheap shot at the end – the 2 million+ copies of the PMBOK in circulation attest to its value as a standard.

  3. hello,

    thanks for the article, it clarified me the basic differences between both methodologies (I don’t know Prince in deep)

    Regards

  4. Interesting comments, i’m trying to design a similar framework to be applied to content distribution in IT.

    Previously hadn’t considered PMBOK at all, but will be taking a look now 🙂
    Thanks to Pat too, your comment reassures me that it wont be a waste of time.

  5. I want to built my career in abroad , i am MBA holder, i got to know about Prince3, my question is how i will be beneficial after Prince3 and how n where i have to enroll myself.

  6. Pingback: A History of Value, Flow and Quality by Cost Of Delay

  7. Pingback: A History of Value, Flow and Quality - Black Swan Farming

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s