Black Swan Risks

A black swan???

Black swans are becoming popular in far too many places! Not too many people would confuse Daffy Duck with a black swan but when it comes to risks, it seems too many people are prepared to accept anything with black feathers is a black swan….

I have just finished a really interesting discussion with Bob Prieto on the subject. Bob’s article in January’s PM World Today discussing ‘black swan risks’ and my letter to the editor in the February edition set the framework (the PMWT website has closed).

The key definition of a ‘black swan’ proposed by N.N. Taleb is that the ‘black swan’ was unpredicted and unpredictable, but in hindsight it appears that it should have been foreseeable. Birds have a range of different plumages, there is no reason not to presume swans could not have other colours but equally, but in the 18th century, there was no reasonable basis to assume swans would be anything but ‘white’ (view links to further discussion).

Another black swan...???

Following on from the debate, the challenge I see facing management is in two parts firstly providing sufficient rigour in the assessment of risks to encapsulate most of the reasonably foreseeable risks and making appropriate decisions based on a proper understanding of the issues. The key issue in the 2000 Ericsson semiconductor factory fire highlighted in Bob’s article was not the fire, it was the single source of supply, creating a critical single point of failure. Many events: fire, earthquake, industrial, environmental and dozens of other causes could have shut down the factory. Add all of the individual low risk occurrences together and the likelihood of the factory being out of business starts to increase. This seems to be exactly the same scenario that played out in the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster. The compounding effect of multiple individual decisions caused the disaster. Any one decision on its own was probably OK, the combination was not. Understanding the whole cannot be based on rigid rules the interactions are far too complex, Practical Wisdom  is needed.

The second is building adequate resilience into an organisation to cope with both the accepted high impact low probability risks and the unknowable unknowns that are genuine ‘black swans’. This involves having some spare capacity and some rehearsed disaster management processes. This may not be 100% cost effective but the damage caused by having no capacity to deal with major problems is far worse.

Real black swans

The final thought is ensuring you have an effective system for watching the environment to identify as early as possible the emerging problems. As Josh Billings said “It ain’t so much the things we don’t know that get us into trouble. It’s the things we know that just ain’t so!”  The idea of Black Swans is a valuable concept that warns us to expect the unexpected even after we have implemented effective risk management! The only certainty is uncertainty, and we need to remember that we will continue to be surprised even if we have implemented the most effective risk management strategies. For more ideas and resources, visit our Practical Risk Management page.


6 responses to “Black Swan Risks

  1. The notion of a Black Swan is pretty much defined in one of three ways.

    1. The disproportionate role of high-impact, hard to predict, and rare events that are beyond the realm of normal expectations in history, science, finance and technology.

    2. The non-computability of the probability of the consequential rare events using scientific methods (owing to the very nature of small probabilities).

    3. The psychological biases that make people individually and collectively blind to uncertainty and unaware of the massive role of the rare event in historical affairs.

    I woudl conjecture that the 3rd definition is where projects get in trouble. Definitions 1 and 2 are in fact within the probability distribution of the risk statistical processes. Apply number 3 to numbers 1 and 2 are also the source of failure to recognize the risk as “Possible.” is a similar post.

    In our domain of mission critical high risk projects, when we here those outside our domain speak of Black Swans my first thought is “keep looking,” you’re not done yet on the search. If it has a probability – that is inside the curve – then it’s but black, you’re just to lazy to find it.

  2. The rate of change is increasing almost geometrically with a larger percentage of events occurring which are unpredictable ,unquantifiable and have never happened before.
    In addition the latest Mc Kinsey survey states that 50% of a given firm,s competitors did not even exist more than two years ago.
    This too is a new phenomenon that did not occur 20 years ago.
    Therefore all you can realistically do is build in some robustness and use futurology techniques such as Horizon Scanning to make intelligent guesses and Genius Ghosting /Wisdom Warfare to wargame different scenarios .
    Following the principle of creating no hostages to fortune will leave clients less exposed but rather then “armour plate the car”,it is better to improve the agility of it,s handling so that it can steer out of trouble.

  3. Pingback: Stakeholder Risk Tolerance « Stakeholder Management's Blog

  4. Pingback: Stakeholder Risk Tolerance | Mosaicproject’s Blog

  5. Pingback: Averaging the Power of Portfolios « Stakeholder Management's Blog

  6. Pingback: Averaging the Power of Portfolios | Mosaicproject’s Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s