The origins of Integrity

Lynda’s last post, Integrity is the key to delivering bad news successfully reminded me of a speech reported by a colleague, Bill Stewart of PMLG, Atlanta, USA several years ago on the origins of ‘integrity’.

The speech was given by The following speech was given by Marine General Charles C. Krulak at a leadership and ethics conference Scope 2000 on January 27, 2000:

We study and we discuss ethical principles because it serves to strengthen and validate our own inner value system … It gives direction to what I call our moral compass. It is the understanding of ethics that becomes the foundation upon which we can deliberately commit to inviolate principles. It becomes the basis of what we are … Of what we include in our character. Based on it, we commit to doing what is right. We expect such commitment from our leaders. But most importantly, we must demand it of ourselves.

Sound morals and ethical behavior cannot be established or created in a day … A semester … Or a year. They must be institutionalized within our character over time … They must become a way of life. They go beyond our individual services and beyond our ranks or positions; they cut to the heart and to the soul of who we are and what we are and what we must be … Men and women of character.

They arm us for the challenges to come and they impart to us a sense of wholeness. They unite us in the calling we now know as the profession of arms.

Of all the moral and ethical guideposts that we have been brought up to recognize, the one that, for me, stands above the rest … The one that I have kept in the forefront of my mind …is integrity. It is my ethical and personal touchstone.

Integrity as we know it today stands for soundness of moral principle and character – uprightness – honesty. Yet there is more. Integrity is also an ideal … A goal to strive for … And for a man or woman to “walk in their integrity” is to require constant discipline and usage. The word integrity itself is a martial word that comes to us from an ancient Roman army tradition.

During the time of the 12 Caesars, the Roman army would conduct morning inspections. As the inspecting Centurion would come in front of each legionnaire, the soldier would strike with his right fist the armor breastplate that covered his heart. The armor had to be strongest there in order to protect the heart from the sword thrusts and from arrow strikes. As the soldier struck his armor, he would shout “integritas”, (in-teg-ri-tas) which in Latin means material wholeness, completeness, and entirety. The inspecting Centurion would listen closely for this affirmation and also for the ring that well kept armor would give off. Satisfied that the armor was sound and that the soldier beneath it was protected, he would then move on to the next man.

At about the same time, the Praetorians or imperial bodyguard were ascending into power and influence. Drawn from the best “politically correct” soldiers of the legions, they received the finest equipment and armor. They no longer had to shout “integritas” to signify that their armor was sound. Instead, as they struck their breastplate, they would shout “hail Caesar” to signify that their heart belonged to the imperial personage – not to their unit – not to an institution – not to a code of ideals. They armored themselves to serve the cause of a single man.

A century passed and the rift between the legion and the imperial bodyguard and its excesses grew larger. To signify the difference between the two organizations, the Legionnaire, upon striking his armor would no longer shout “integritas”, but instead would shout “integer” (in-te-ger).

Integer means undiminished – complete – perfect. It not only indicated that the armor was sound, it also indicated that the soldier wearing the armor was sound of character. He was complete in his integrity … His heart was in the right place … His standards and morals were high. He was not associated with the immoral conduct that was rapidly becoming the signature of the praetorian guards.

The armor of integrity continued to serve the legion well. For over four centuries they held the line against the marauding Goths and vandals but by 383 AD, the social decline that infected the republic and the praetorian guard had its effects upon the legion.

As a 4th century Roman general wrote, “When, because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to feel heavy since the soldiers rarely, if ever, wore it. Therefore, they first asked the emperor to set aside the breastplates and mail and then the helmets. So our soldiers fought the Goths without any protection for the heart and head and were often beaten by archers”. Although there were many disasters, which lead to the loss of great cities, no one tried to restore the armor to the infantry. They took their armor off, and when the armor came off – so too came their  integrity it was only a matter of a few years until the legion rotted from within and was unable to hold the frontiers…the barbarians were at the gates.

Integrity … It is a combination of the words, “integritas” and “integer”. It refers to the putting on of armor, of building a completeness … A wholeness … A wholeness in character. How appropriate that the word integrity is a derivative of two words describing the character of a member of the profession of arms.

The military has a tradition of producing great leaders that possess the highest ethical standards and integrity. It produces men and women of character … Character that allows them to deal ethically with the challenges of today and to make conscious decisions about how they will approach tomorrow. However, as I mentioned earlier, this is not done instantly. It requires that integrity becomes a way of life … It must be woven into the very fabric of our soul. Just as was true in the days of Imperial Rome, you either walk in your integrity daily, or you take off the armor of the “integer” (in-te-ger) and leave your heart and soul exposed… Open to attack.

My challenge to you is simple but often very difficult … Wear your armor of integrity … Take full measure of its weight … Find comfort in its protection … Do not become lax. And always, always, remember that no one can take your integrity from you … You and only you can give it away!

The biblical book of practical ethics – better known as the book of proverbs – sums it up very nicely: “the integrity of the upright shall guide them: but the perverseness of transgressors shall destroy them”. (Proverbs 11:3 KJV)

Thank you.

Too often in the decade since the speech was given, we have experienced the fallout of leaders taking the “easy wrong” instead of the “hard correct” option.

As project, program, and portfolio leaders, we are responsible for the successful implementation of projects and programs that deliver our organization’s strategic vision. And to help ensure success, we apply practical and proven process that mitigates the risk of failure. Yet, each of us have experienced or continue to experience situations where we are asked to dump process.

Suggestions such as ‘Lets skip planning since we are already behind schedule’ or  or ‘Let me give you status when something goes wrong instead of doing a weekly reports’ are examples of requests to take the easy wrong, instead of the hard correct option.

Embracing and demonstrating the moral principal and honesty to consistently and unwaveringly doing the right thing for your organization is the embodiment of integrity and importantly is the underpinning of effective governance. Other research also based on the US military demonstrated that ethics is a ‘top down’ system – people lower in the hierarchy are unlikely to have better ethics than those above, integrity is likely to follow a similar pattern, the baseline standard is set at the top and will have a tendency to deteriorate as you move down the hierarchy.  This is a challenge for all of us.


One response to “The origins of Integrity

  1. I have struggled with this issue, more than once. I suspect it has hurt my career, more than once. The discussion of doing the ‘hard correct’, especially as a contractor is sometimes a tough one. I have left contracts and recently my first permanent job in seven years for just this reason. Top down ethics are hard to find these days.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s